Comments on: AIDS Group Campaign Leads To Paper Retraction, Review of Medical Journal http://www.aidsbeacon.com/news/2009/10/01/aids-group-campaign-leads-to-paper-retraction-review-of-medical-journal/ Independent, up-to-date news and information about HIV and AIDS. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:16:14 +0000 hourly 1 By: J Todd DeShong http://www.aidsbeacon.com/news/2009/10/01/aids-group-campaign-leads-to-paper-retraction-review-of-medical-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-222 J Todd DeShong Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:54:37 +0000 http://www.aidsbeacon.com/?p=8616#comment-222 Mr. Geiger calls believers in orthodox HIV science homophobes and sexophobes and yet his "read it and weep" link shows that Mr. Geiger is the true homophobe: "A bleeding-edge lifestyle, the harmonic convergence of three cultural revolutions, drug, sexual, and gay, took a heavy toll on its most sublime practitioners. They engaged in anonymous sex on an almost unheard of scale,..." Those are the words from the link, Mr. Geiger. Have you pulled a Baker and posted a thread that undermines your arguement? JTD Mr. Geiger calls believers in orthodox HIV science homophobes and sexophobes and yet his “read it and weep” link shows that Mr. Geiger is the true homophobe:
“A bleeding-edge lifestyle, the harmonic convergence of three cultural revolutions, drug, sexual, and gay, took a heavy toll on its most sublime practitioners. They engaged in anonymous sex on an almost unheard of scale,…”
Those are the words from the link, Mr. Geiger. Have you pulled a Baker and posted a thread that undermines your arguement?
JTD

]]> By: Michael Geiger http://www.aidsbeacon.com/news/2009/10/01/aids-group-campaign-leads-to-paper-retraction-review-of-medical-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-114 Michael Geiger Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:59:47 +0000 http://www.aidsbeacon.com/?p=8616#comment-114 You boneheads all bit the big one, and swallowed it hook, line, and stinker. And then you think people like Seth Kalichman, who himself profits out of the public hiv research funds, has anything intelligent to offer. Check out his looney website. Nothing but an ad-hom attack site aimed at those who are trying to yank him and the others back out of the public's pockets. 1) the years of high aids deaths are the EXACT YEARS that toxic high dose AZT was given to all positives who were first off scared, stressed and depressed into immune suppressing states of being after being given hopeless death sentences after testing positive on tests that were recalled and banned years ago. 2) Nancy Padian’s 10 year study of 160 pairs of hiv positives and their seronegative partners showed ZERO transmission of hiv to any hiv negative parters (even though 1/4th never used condoms). There is no existing proof of sexual transmission, except in your heads. 3) Just because doctors scare their patients to death with diagnoses of death, and just because gays stressed and doped themselves to death or were scared and drugged to death with AZT, and just because starving hopeless people in Africa are stressing and starving themselves to death, does NOT MEAN it has anything to do with the big sex boogeyman of HIV. Are you all a bunch of sexophobes or homophobes or racists? If not, then why do you believe the hiv crap for 25 years? All of your herd mentality and willful common ignorance shows HOW RIGHT Elsevier was to put out the so-called “denialist” findings. Only problem is you goons are calling the wrong team denialists. Wanna see the denialists who are living under illusions of the sex boogeyman of death? Go look in the mirror, fools. Read it and weep? http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/foye8.1.1.html Obviously, the belief in hiv=aids is nothing more than underlying socialized homophobia, sexophobia, and racism beliefs that are disquised as science and medicine. You boneheads all bit the big one!!! Hahahahahaaaaa You boneheads all bit the big one, and swallowed it hook, line, and stinker. And then you think people like Seth Kalichman, who himself profits out of the public hiv research funds, has anything intelligent to offer. Check out his looney website. Nothing but an ad-hom attack site aimed at those who are trying to yank him and the others back out of the public’s pockets.

1) the years of high aids deaths are the EXACT YEARS that toxic high dose AZT was given to all positives who were first off scared, stressed and depressed into immune suppressing states of being after being given hopeless death sentences after testing positive on tests that were recalled and banned years ago.

2) Nancy Padian’s 10 year study of 160 pairs of hiv positives and their seronegative partners showed ZERO transmission of hiv to any hiv negative parters (even though 1/4th never used condoms). There is no existing proof of sexual transmission, except in your heads.

3) Just because doctors scare their patients to death with diagnoses of death, and just because gays stressed and doped themselves to death or were scared and drugged to death with AZT, and just because starving hopeless people in Africa are stressing and starving themselves to death, does NOT MEAN it has anything to do with the big sex boogeyman of HIV. Are you all a bunch of sexophobes or homophobes or racists? If not, then why do you believe the hiv crap for 25 years?

All of your herd mentality and willful common ignorance shows HOW RIGHT Elsevier was to put out the so-called “denialist” findings. Only problem is you goons are calling the wrong team denialists. Wanna see the denialists who are living under illusions of the sex boogeyman of death? Go look in the mirror, fools.

Read it and weep? http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/foye8.1.1.html

Obviously, the belief in hiv=aids is nothing more than underlying socialized homophobia, sexophobia, and racism beliefs that are disquised as science and medicine.

You boneheads all bit the big one!!! Hahahahahaaaaa

]]> By: Seth Kalichman http://www.aidsbeacon.com/news/2009/10/01/aids-group-campaign-leads-to-paper-retraction-review-of-medical-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Seth Kalichman Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:33:00 +0000 http://www.aidsbeacon.com/?p=8616#comment-112 The Editor of Medical Hypotheses is quite vocal about the problems with peer review and the value of non-peer reviewed journals. Although the idea of an editorial review journal may seem good in concept, it has failed miserably at Medical Hypotheses. The Duesberg article is not the first AIDS Denialism paper published at Medical Hypotheses. Publishing the Duesberg paper makes the case against editorial review and reaffirms what we know: That peer review is not perfect but it is the best process we have for protecting the integrity of the scientific literature. Hopefully, Medical Hypotheses will correct course. If not, the journal should be terminated from all major indexing services and treated as a newsletter. Seth Kalichman http://denyingaids.blogspot.com The Editor of Medical Hypotheses is quite vocal about the problems with peer review and the value of non-peer reviewed journals. Although the idea of an editorial review journal may seem good in concept, it has failed miserably at Medical Hypotheses. The Duesberg article is not the first AIDS Denialism paper published at Medical Hypotheses. Publishing the Duesberg paper makes the case against editorial review and reaffirms what we know: That peer review is not perfect but it is the best process we have for protecting the integrity of the scientific literature. Hopefully, Medical Hypotheses will correct course. If not, the journal should be terminated from all major indexing services and treated as a newsletter.
Seth Kalichman
http://denyingaids.blogspot.com

]]>